I can't find the cause yet, but it does appear to be specific to the
Java installed on my machine. Nothing happens and the app just doesn't
launch at all. There are some entries in the system logs, but nothing
helpful.
I don't think this should hold up the beta, so I'm +1 on this release.
I'll see if I can figure out what the cause is for the next beta. To
avoid the nightmare that is Java on the desktop in this age of
fragmented Java packages caused by Oracle trying to extract every drop
of blood, combined with Apple's ever more draconian code signing and
notarisation... maybe we should think about bundling Java inside the
Modeler app.
/rant
+1 on this release
Ari
On 15/3/19 6:57pm, Nikita Timofeev wrote:
I cannot launch modeler on my machine with openJDK 11 from the
adoptopenjdk project. Can others reproduce this issue?
Tested it on two Macs, seems fine. Found some strange crashes if
launching binary
file directly on older MacOS version (10.13.6), but in normal case it
just works.
Maybe you can provide some details? Is Modeler crashes or just nothing happens?
Could you try to launch generic version of the Modeler and some older
Mac versions?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:58 AM Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote:
The maven repo isn't available to me. That URL throws a 404. Is that
just because the folder has no index?
At any rate, I verified the source and OSX bundles. All looks good
except I cannot launch modeler on my machine with openJDK 11 from the
adoptopenjdk project. Can others reproduce this issue? I spent a while
trying to figure out why it isn't running, but no luck yet.
Ari
On 8/3/19 12:23am, Nikita Timofeev wrote:
Uploaded fixed version:
Maven repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1028/
Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.1.B1/
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:44 PM Nikita Timofeev
<[email protected]> wrote:
I think I can just redo this release. It's better be safe than sorry.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:01 AM John Huss <[email protected]> wrote:
If it's needed at runtime as a dependency it should be bundled. I still
prefer to manually manage jar dependencies most of the time.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:51 PM Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote:
What is the general Apache consensus about bundling third party
libraries? In an age where everyone is accessing libraries from maven
co-ordinates, is it necessary to include any of them at all? I'd be
surprised if a single person used them ever from our zip. We aren't
signing them or providing any oversight of their contents.
Ari
On 5/3/19 12:18am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Good catch. I guess since this is a dependency that can be easily
downloaded from the internet, we can let it slip for now and proceed with
the release (and fix it in the next release). Does anyone feel strongly
about this one?
Andrus
On Mar 1, 2019, at 7:32 PM, John Huss <[email protected]> wrote:
The windows zip doesn't include the file
"lib/third-party/slf4j-api-1.7.25.jar" which the mac one does.
Otherwise it looks good.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:28 AM Nikita Timofeev <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi all,
Here is long-promised 4.1 beta release with lots of fixes and some
minor features.
Release notes:
https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/4.1.B1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Maven repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1028/
Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.1.B1/
Please evaluate it and cast your votes.
--
Best regards,
Nikita Timofeev
--
Best regards,
Nikita Timofeev
--
Best regards,
Nikita Timofeev
