I would be fine with fixing it up and remaking the release, but I don’t know how much of a hassle that is. I can find time to fix AutoAdapter in the next two days I think.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:34 PM Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > Been thinking more about this... This breaks basic commit operations for > both Derby and SQLServer, making it a major issue. We've never shipped > releases with known bugs like this, even milestones. On the other hand > there is a workaround - use an explicit adapter. > > I am voting -0, which means that I wouldn't release it like that, but I > don't want to veto the release either. If the majority decides we should > proceed, so be it. > > Andrus > > > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Andrus, > > > > Given this is a milestone release, I think it is fine to release with the > > AutoAdapter issue. These releases aren't required or expected to be > > production-ready, although that would certainly be nice. They are for > > finding issues needing to be addressed, and you have. :-) > > > > mrg > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:24 AM Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > > wrote: > > > >> So looks like this will affect users of Derby and SQLServer who are also > >> using the AutoAdapter (don't know if anyone still NOT using the > >> AutoAdapter?). I suppose we can still release the M1, though it will > not be > >> usable for me unfortunately until this is fixed. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Andrus > >> > >>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Nikita Timofeev < > ntimof...@objectstyle.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Andrus, > >>> > >>> Yes, LinkMove problems related to batch generated keys. The problem is > >>> with AutoAdapter, it simply doesn't define > >>> supportsGeneratedKeysForBatchInserts() method. > >>> DerbyAdapter itself works fine. > >>> > >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Andrus Adamchik < > and...@objectstyle.org> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Still testing the release... As expected 4.2 is no longer a drop-in > >> replacement of 4.0 for either Agrest or LinkMove (because of the > Property > >> class refactoring). So I made a few tweaks to LM to make it compile [1]. > >> Now I am getting the following error on commit in a bunch of tests (e.g. > >> CreateIT) [2]. > >>>> > >>>> Is this related to 57332e865f5dabb9c7adef4bac9a61137f6828c4 (batch > mode > >> and PKs on Derby) ? > >>>> > >>>> (Derby version used in tests is 10.14.2.0 - the latest that supports > >> Java 8) > >>>> > >>>> Andrus > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Apr 7, 2020, at 2:03 PM, Nikita Timofeev < > ntimof...@objectstyle.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> Here is another try for the Cayenne 4.2.M1 release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Release notes: > >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/4.2.M1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > >>>>> Maven repo: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1038/ > >>>>> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.2.M1/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> Nikita Timofeev > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2 < > >> https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2> > >>>> > >>>> [2] org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.4.2.M1 Apr 07 2020 > >> 09:32:02] Mismatching number of generated PKs: expected 2, instead got 1 > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.FlushObserver.nextGeneratedRows(FlushObserver.java:77) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction$1.nextGeneratedRows(DataNodeQueryAction.java:77) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.processGeneratedKeys(BatchAction.java:288) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.runAsBatch(BatchAction.java:133) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.performAction(BatchAction.java:94) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction.runQuery(DataNodeQueryAction.java:97) > >>>> at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNode.performQueries(DataNode.java:273) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.lambda$executeQueries$6(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:175) > >>>> at java.util.HashMap.forEach(HashMap.java:1288) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.executeQueries(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:174) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.flush(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:89) > >>>> at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncFlush(DataDomain.java:637) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncNoFilters(DataDomain.java:609) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:835) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.lambda$onSync$0(TransactionFilter.java:61) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:180) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInNewTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:152) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$NestedTransactionHandler.handle(DefaultTransactionManager.java:95) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:62) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:40) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.onSync(TransactionFilter.java:61) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:834) > >>>> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSync(DataDomain.java:596) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.flushToParent(DataContext.java:737) > >>>> at > >> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.commitChanges(DataContext.java:686) > >>>> at > >> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.commitTarget(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:63) > >>>> at > >> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.process(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:44) > >>>> at > >> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.lambda$createBatchProcessor$1(CreateTask.java:72) > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.batch.BatchRunner.run(BatchRunner.java:57) > >>>> at > >> > com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.doRun(CreateTask.java:62) > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:46) > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:31) > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:39) > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:19) > >>>> at com.nhl.link.move.itest.CreateIT.testSync(CreateIT.java:24) > >>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > >>>> at > >> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > >>>> at > >> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) > >>>> at > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) > >>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309) > >>>> at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:160) > >>>> at > >> > com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68) > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> Nikita Timofeev > >> > >> > >
