Will adding this work? (Worked in a simple test I wrote.)
public static boolean nullSafeEquals(BigDecimal o1, BigDecimal o2)
{
if (o1 == null || o2 == null)
return o1 == o2;
return o1.compareTo(o2) == 0;
}
Then delete the BigDecimal stuff from the other nullSafeEquals. (Revert
the changes.)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 8:47 AM Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just ran into an obscure and minor but at the same time fundamental bug -
> Cayenne generated unneeded updates when the only change is BidDecimal value
> scale [1]. Essentially for BigDecimals we shouldn't be calling
> "a.equals(b)" but use "a.compareTo(b) == 0". I have a fix [2], but using
> "instanceof" inside a common performance-sensitive code feels dirty. I'd
> much rather a comparison strategy to be a part of the PropertyDescriptor
> object or something. So not applying the PR just yet.
>
> Wanted to mention it here. Perhaps there are other data types that can't
> use "equals" for some reason. And perhaps there are other solutions to this
> problem too...
>
> Andrus
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2660
> [2] https://github.com/apache/cayenne/pull/426
