> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY, > multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT); > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY, > multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT); > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY, > javaGroupsFile, ""); > if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory, > JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName()))
None of these settings are in the Modeler for quite some time. > Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I > just don't like repeating things... I'd to avoid such a heavy dependency if all we need is constants, but luckily not an issue anymore. Andrus > On Dec 20, 2021, at 4:00 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, I was pulling in cayenne-jgroups primarily to access constants, such > as: > > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY, > multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT); > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY, > multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT); > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY, > javaGroupsFile, ""); > if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory, > JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName())) > ... > > If I didn't add JGroupsModule as a DI module it crashed (forget the exact > reason right now, but I can try it again later). Note: It didn't break ages > ago when I was using 4.0.B1, but after I updated it to use 4.0.2. When > using B1 I had access to the constants without needing to provide a JGroups > dependency. > > Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I > just don't like repeating things... > > mrg > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:37 AM Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> FWIW, I was about to suggest removing "cayenne-jgroups" from Cayenne 5.0 >> as an old and unreliable piece of software we don't want to support :) >> >> As far as the Modeler goes it should not depend on JGroups at all. All the >> events in the Modeler are in-process and can be passed around within the >> JVM. >> >> Andrus >> >>> On Dec 19, 2021, at 6:35 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> While getting the JavaFX modeler running again, I was having issues with >>> JGroups classes/interfaces not being found/defined, so I added version >> 5.x >>> to the POM and it didn't work. Then 4.x and it didn't work. Then 3.x and >> it >>> didn't work. Then 2.x and it finally worked. >>> >>> Does Cayenne only work with JGroups 2.x? * >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> mrg >>> >>> * I used 2.12.3.Final here... >> >>
