So even in your case you'd bootstrap ServerRuntime in a different way than that legacy approach. And now there are two servlet options - javax and jakarta, both requiring separate modules. So properly maintaining it in Cayenne is not that trivial anymore. Maybe we move it to Cayenne examples instead - https://github.com/apache/cayenne-examples <https://github.com/apache/cayenne-examples>
Andrus > On Jul 14, 2022, at 2:40 PM, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm good with all of that. Except we do use cayenne-web (stateless). It's > not a lot of code so we could pull it in and keep our own copy, but I > wonder how many people are using it. We're not defining the serverRuntime > in web.xml (which would be a bit limiting and clunky), but otherwise I like > the convenience it provides for using cayenne in a servlet environment. > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 11:29 AM Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I agree. Though I suggest to keep it in the current untested mode for >> another cycle. Let's officially deprecate it in 5.0 and see if we get any >> feedback. >> >> Andrus >> >>> On Jul 7, 2022, at 2:46 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Code itself is small and easy to maintain, as it doesn't do much. We >>> just don't have a proper test suit for it and I'm sure not all Cayenne >>> modules are compatible with OSGI, at least we have some non-unque >>> packages (partially this would be resolved once we drop bunch of >>> deprecated modules), >>> If we keep it as is, is not much of a problem, I just don't like those >>> parts with unknown state. >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:02 PM Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jul 5, 2022, at 2:00 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Id like to add OSGi support to that removal list as well. >>>> >>>> OSGi support was developed in response to a user request (should be >> somewhere in the mailing list archives). I have no idea if anyone is still >> using it, and I am generally unclear on the state of OSGi these days. So >> how hard is it to keep it around? >>>> >>>> Andrus >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Nikita Timofeev >> >>
