Yeah, I got the files published yesterday and was going to do the announcement, website update, etc, today.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 8:01 AM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > We were actually thinking with Nikita to pre-build and commit the .exe > launcher, so that Windows assemblies could be done on any platform. > > So I see the files are published. Let me try to find time and write the > announcement. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > > > On Jun 22, 2026, at 2:26 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Excluding Windows... > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 2:16 PM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Congrats! And now we have more than one person who knows how to do it :) > >> > >>> On Jun 22, 2026, at 1:48 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Here's the final voting result: > >>> > >>> Andrus Adamchik (PMC): +1 > >>> Nikita Timofeev (PMC): +1 > >>> John Huss (PMC): +1 > >>> Michael Gentry (PMC): +1 > >>> > >>> We'll get the release publicly published shortly. > >>> > >>> Thank you everyone! > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 1:10 PM John Huss <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I am +1 as well. > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 12:02 PM Michael Gentry <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I've updated my scripts that check for files that aren't properly > >>>> licensed > >>>>> and saw the two I missed before. I think these can be fixed for the > >> next > >>>>> release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Everything checks out on my end, so I'm also a +1. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> mrg > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 6:14 AM Nikita Timofeev < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - sources parity - good > >>>>>> - signatures - good (Windows assembly is signed with my key) > >>>>>> - full build from sources - good > >>>>>> - MacOS Modeler and MCP - runs on MacOS, JDK 25 > >>>>>> - Generic Modeler and MCP - runs on MacOS, JDK 25 and 21 > >>>>>> - Windows Modeler - runs on Windows 11, JDK 25 unsupported, only JDK > >> 21 > >>>>>> checked > >>>>>> - RAT - missing headers in TestMcpServer.java and in > >>>>>> org.slf4j.spi.SLF4JServiceProvider > >>>>>> (we have headers in other providers). Good enough for the milestone > >>>>>> release, it may be fixed later. > >>>>>> - Staging Maven repo - good, verified with a demo project > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also a note about the RAT: a bunch of new `.md` files are not > >> excluded, > >>>>>> need to fix config. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2026 at 8:01 PM Andrus Adamchik < > [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ok, to back up my intuition on the license headers I am going to > lean > >>>>> on > >>>>>>> the "lack of creativity" exception and "PMC judgement" clause in > the > >>>>> ASF > >>>>>>> policy :) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 2026, at 11:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I am +1. I added MCP checks to my previous checklist (and they > >>>> pass). > >>>>>>> Haven't tested Modeler on Windows. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Noticed the Mac .dmg doesn't have the background image and our > >>>> custom > >>>>>>> layout. The contents of the .dmg are correct though, so this is > not a > >>>>>>> blocker either. (I've seen my own builds losing the layout on rare > >>>>>>> occasions; never got to the bottom of it though). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One of the unit tests was missing the Apache header (my fault, I > >>>>> fixed > >>>>>>> that already on the "past-M2" branch). I don't think this > >>>> disqualifies > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>> release. This is an internal unit test, and is not expected to be > >>>>>>> referenced or embedded by the end users in their code. Also the new > >>>> .md > >>>>>>> files don't have Apache headers, which I think is totally ok. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Anyone has a different opinion on this? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Michael Gentry < > [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hello everyone! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Finally time for the 5.0 M2 release! > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Nikita and Andrus for helping with my environmental > issues! > >>>>>>>>> Hopefully smoother in the future. (I'll have to give Windows the > >>>>>> stinky > >>>>>>>>> eye.) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Release Notes: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/cayenne-parent-5.0-M2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Maven Repo: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1063/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Assemblies (Note the updated KEYS file there): > >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please evaluate the assemblies and cast your votes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>> Nikita Timofeev > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
