+1 (binding)

I checked

- PGP signatures are valid.
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/celeborn/KEYS
gpg --import KEYS
gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.2.0-incubating-source.tgz.asc
gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.2.0-incubating-bin.tgz.asc
- checksums are correct.
sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.2.0-incubating-bin.tgz.sha512
sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.2.0-incubating-source.tgz.sha512
- LICENSE and NOTICE files exist.
- DISCLAIMER file exists.
- release files are in correct location.
- release files have the word "incubating" in their name.
- build success from source code (macOS).

```
./build/make-distribution.sh -Pspark-3.3
```

Thanks,
Kerwin Zhang

Ethan Feng <ethanf...@apache.org> 于2023年2月20日周一 23:28写道:
>
> Hi Celeborn community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn (Incubating)
> 0.2.0-incubating-rc5
>
> The git tag to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/releases/tag/v0.2.0-incubating-rc5
>
> The git commit hash:
> 52527756c3d2262cfd3e313272b82216c505c7e2
>
> The source and binary artifacts can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celeborn/v0.2.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with:
> FCF20BB29C7BEFDF58F998F76392F71F37356FA0
>
> My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/celeborn/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary
> number of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason)
>
> Checklist for release:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> Steps to validate the release:
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> Starting with my +1 (binding):
>
> * Download links, checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release.
> * Release files have the word incubating in their name.
> * DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
> * All files have license headers if necessary.
> * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> * The source tarball matches the git tag.
> * Build from source is successful.
>
> Thanks,
> Ethan Feng

Reply via email to