+1 - links are valid - signatured and checksums are good - can build from source code - Ubuntu 22.04, x86, Java 17 - build/make-distribution.sh --sbt-enabled --release
Thanks, Cheng Pan On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:38 PM Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I have checked > - Download links are valid. > - Checksums and signatures are valid. > - Git commit hash is correct > - No binary files in the source release > - Built binary from source code with command successfully: > ./build/make-distribution.sh -Pspark-3.5 > > I have upgraded version to 0.5.1-snapshot in internal test environment a week > ago. 0.5.1 works well in test environment. > > Regards, > Nicholas Jiang > > On 2024/07/23 03:38:57 Ethan Feng wrote: > > Hello, Celeborn community, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn > > 0.5.1-rc0 > > > > The git tag to be voted upon: > > https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.5.1-rc0 > > > > Source and binary artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.5.1-rc0 > > > > The git commit hash: > > 85297ca64c0973f19b15831031859c3104f0db5b > > > > The staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1081 > > > > The fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts is signed with: > > FCF20BB29C7BEFDF58F998F76392F71F37356FA0 > > > > My public key to verify signatures can be found in: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary > > number of votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason) > > > > Steps to validate the release: > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > * Download links, checksums, and PGP signatures are valid. > > * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release. > > * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. > > * All files have license headers if necessary. > > * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in the source archive. > > * The source tarball matches the git tag. > > * Build from source is successful. > > > > Regards, > > Ethan Feng > >
