+1 (non-binding) I checked the following things: - git commit hash is correct. - download links are valid. - release files are in correct location. - signatures and checksums are good. - LICENSE and NOTICE files exist. - build success from source code(ubuntu 16.04, java 8). ``` ./build/make-distribution.sh --release ```
Thanks, Yihe Li On 2024/11/18 03:44:09 rexxiong wrote: > +1 (binding) > I checked > - Download links are valid. > - git commit hash is correct > - Checksums and signatures are valid. > - Successfully built the binary from the source on MacOs (Java 8) with > Command: build/make-distribution.sh --sbt-enabled --release > - All jars to be released are complete in the stage repo. > - The list of client jars to be released is complete in the stage > repository. > > Thanks, > Jiashu Xiong > > Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> 于2024年11月15日周五 04:49写道： > > > Hi Celeborn community, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn > > 0.5.2-rc4 > > > > The git tag to be voted upon: > > https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.5.2-rc4 > > > > The git commit hash: > > 7fd96fdde227bc30e2d4669c23483b80169cd97e source and binary artifacts can be > > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.5.2-rc4 > > > > The staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1087 > > > > Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with: > > 9EC4BC38E04BC086C026AC681FC79E01BA3B84D5 > > > > My public key to verify signatures can be found in: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary > > number of votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason) > > > > Steps to validate the release: > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > * Download links, checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current > > release. > > * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. > > * All files have license headers if necessary. > > * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > * The source tarball matches the git tag. > > * Build from source is successful. > > > > Regards, > > Nicholas Jiang >
