+1 (non-binding). I checked: - links are valid - signatures and checksum are correct - build from source code successfully
On 2024/11/26 03:36:10 angers zhu wrote: > +1(binding) > > I checked > - Download links are valid. > - build from source > - Checksums and signatures are valid. > - existence of LICENSE and NOTICE files > Command: build/make-distribution.sh --sbt-enabled --release > > Thanks, > Jiashu Xiong > > Xu Huang <[email protected]> 于2024年11月26日周二 11:16写道： > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > I checked the following items: > > 1. git commit hash > > 2. existence of LICENSE and NOTICE files > > 3. build from source code > > 4. validity of staging repo link > > > > Thanks, > > Xu Huang > > > > Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> 于2024年11月22日周五 21:51写道： > > > > > Hi Celeborn community, > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn > > > 0.5.2-rc6 > > > > > > The git tag to be voted upon: > > > https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.5.2-rc6 > > > > > > The git commit hash: > > > 513bd5995df3f062ea0e8edea12c02690bd2393a source and binary artifacts can > > be > > > found at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.5.2-rc6 > > > > > > The staging repo: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1091 > > > > > > Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with: > > > 9EC4BC38E04BC086C026AC681FC79E01BA3B84D5 > > > > > > My public key to verify signatures can be found in: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary > > > number of votes are reached. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason) > > > > > > Steps to validate the release: > > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > > > * Download links, checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > > * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current > > > release. > > > * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. > > > * All files have license headers if necessary. > > > * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > > * The source tarball matches the git tag. > > > * Build from source is successful. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Nicholas Jiang > > >
