The vote passed, thanks all for helping with this release, I’m going to 
conclude the vote result and finalize the release.

Thanks,
Cheng Pan



> On Dec 9, 2024, at 13:19, rexxiong <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1(binding)
> 
> I checked
> - Download links are valid.
> - git commit hash is correct
> - Checksums and signatures are valid.
> - Successfully built the binary from the source on MacOs (Java 8) with
> Command:  build/make-distribution.sh --sbt-enabled --release
> 
> Thanks,
> Jiashu Xiong
> 
> Shaoyun Chen <[email protected]> 于2024年12月9日周一 11:53写道:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> I checked the following things:
>> 
>> - signatures are good.
>> ```
>> gpg --import KEYS
>> gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.4.3-source.tgz.asc
>> gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.4.3-bin.tgz.asc
>> ```
>> - checksums are good.
>> ```
>> sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.4.3-source.tgz.sha512
>> sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.4.3-bin.tgz.sha512
>> ```
>> - build success from source code.
>> ```
>> ./build/make-distribution.sh --release
>> ./build/make-distribution.sh --sbt-enabled --release
>> ```
>> 
>> Nicholas <[email protected]> 于2024年12月9日周一 11:25写道:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> I have verified:
>>> - Git commit hash is correct.
>>> - Checksums and signatures are valid.
>>> - Download links are valid.
>>> - No binary files in the source release.
>>> - Built the binary from the source with command successfully:
>> ./build/make-distribution.sh -Pspark-3.1. Regards,
>>> 
>>> Nicholas Jiang
>>> 
>>> 
>>> At 2024-12-09 11:20:38, "Ethan Feng" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> +1(binding)
>>>> 
>>>> I checked:
>>>> √ release files in the correct location
>>>> √ digital signature and hashes correct
>>>> √ LICENSE and NOTICE files exist and are correct
>>>> √ the contents of the release match the tag in VCS
>>>> √ can build the release from the source
>>>> √ maven artifacts look correct
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ethan Feng
>>>> 
>>>> Cheng Pan <[email protected]> 于2024年12月9日周一 11:16写道:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also with my own +1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have deployed the version on a medium cluster (80+ nodes) for 3
>> days, it runs well so far.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cheng Pan
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2024, at 15:26, Keyong Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I checked
>>>>>> - git commit hash is correct.
>>>>>> - links are valid.
>>>>>> - signatures are good.
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> gpg --import KEYS
>>>>>> gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.4.3-bin.tgz.asc
>>>>>> gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.4.3-source.tgz.asc
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> - checksums are good.
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> shasum --check apache-celeborn-0.4.3-source.tgz.sha512
>>>>>> shasum --check apache-celeborn-0.4.3-bin.tgz.sha512
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> - LICENSE looks good.
>>>>>> - NOTICE looks good.
>>>>>> - build success from source code (macOS).
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> ./build/make-distribution.sh --sbt-enabled --release
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Keyong Zhou
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheng Pan <[email protected]> 于2024年12月3日周二 17:06写道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Celeborn community,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn 0.4.3-rc0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The git tag to be voted upon:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.4.3-rc0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The git commit hash:
>>>>>>> 52cb34603c10bddddfe2bcff0feacc4e5f8d1990
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> source and binary artifacts can be found at:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.4.3-rc0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The staging repo:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1092
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with:
>>>>>>> 8FC8075E1FDC303276C676EE8001952629BCC75D
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
>>>>>>> number of votes are reached.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Steps to validate the release:
>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * Download links, checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>>>>>> * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>> * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
>>>>>>> * All files have license headers if necessary.
>>>>>>> * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>>>>>>> * The source tarball matches the git tag.
>>>>>>> * Build from source is successful.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Cheng Pan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to