Hey folks, I think it has been more than 72h (3 days) since this thread started. This CIP has passed with 3 +1 votes, and has no -1 votes.
Excited to start contributing this to Apache Celeborn!! Thanks everyone for the feedback and discussion :) Thanks, Aravind On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 5:41 AM Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Enrico > > Il giorno dom 10 mag 2026 alle ore 07:19 Karthik Prabhakar < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks Aravind, glad to see this shaped into a CIP. The client-side > > approach has real advantages - sendfile path stays intact, workers stay > out > > of key handling, clean Spark integration. > > > > Worth flagging for the record that CIP-22 is narrower than CELEBORN-2311 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CELEBORN-2311> it's Spark-only > > (Flink/MR clients uncovered), and spark.io.encryption derives keys > locally > > with no KEK/DEK split or external custody - which is the part that > matters > > for the HIPAA/PCI/SOC 2/FedRAMP deployments I had in mind. The KeyService > > SPI with pluggable KMS providers from CELEBORN-2311 is still needed for > > those. > > > > Suggest landing this as the Spark path and keeping CELEBORN-2311 open as > > the umbrella for the engine-agnostic worker-side track. Happy to drive > that > > once this lands. > > > > - Karthik > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 10:16 AM Mridul Muralidharan <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > This is based on what we are currently in the process of rolling out > > > internally in production. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mridul > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 1:53 AM Aravind Patnam <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is a call to vote to contribute CIP 22: Encryption at Rest for > > > > Celeborn Shuffle Data > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xBrLtpb8bk8CdJENiM3aLJCbFThRKLor8uAjSsfXoxE/edit?usp=sharing > > > > >to > > > > Apache Celeborn. > > > > > > > > Please do vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason) > > > > > > > > Thanks once again!! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Aravind K. Patnam > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Karthik > > > -- Aravind K. Patnam
