Hi Roy, Also a +1 from me.
Good Work!. Greetings, Pepijn On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:20 PM erjan altena <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > Nice Work, a +1 from me. > > Regards, > Erjan > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 7:55 AM gerritbinnenmars <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Good work Roy. Can you have a short look at the documentation of > > subprojects. I get an error on these. > > Greetings Gerrit > > -------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------Van: Roy Lenferink < > > [email protected]> Datum: 02-01-19 23:51 (GMT+01:00) Aan: > > [email protected] Onderwerp: [VOTE] Switch celix.a.o from svn to git > > Hi all, > > > > This is a vote for switching the Celix website [1] from the current svn > > pubsub to a new git pubsub approach. Regarding this message [2] changes > > were applied which makes the celix-site repository compliant with the git > > pubsub approach (asf-site branch containing 'content' directory containing > > the generated static site). > > > > The advantages of moving over to git: > > - It will be easier for contributors to submit a patch to the Celix > > website. Right now they have to checkout the svn repository and attach a > > patch to a JIRA ticket. > > - It is easier for committers to apply patches. Committers can just merge a > > pull request using the web interface instead of applying a patch using a > > command-line interface. > > - And it will be easier to get documentation from the main Celix repository > > listed on the website. > > > > I can't think of any disadvantages and therefore I'd like to start a vote > > on moving over. If no-one objects within 72 hours, I'll assume lazy > > consensus and I'll create a ticket with INFRA to move over the site. > > > > +1 from me. > > > > - Roy > > > > [1] https://celix.apache.org/ > > [2] > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2bdabe5492eb105a034bfbd2febe14e2bfaa4ffd0f5da0bb4cd6918b@%3Cdev.celix.apache.org%3E > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------- > Erjan Altena
