[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028566#comment-13028566
]
Florian Müller commented on CMIS-363:
-------------------------------------
Could you please check if the type definition has a property definition
"IndexationId" (case sensitive)?!
The test is not complaining that the property is "not set". It is complaining
that there is a property definition but no corresponding property (tag).
> Property is null! (AbstractSessionTest.java:1215)
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CMIS-363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-363
> Project: Chemistry
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck
> Affects Versions: OpenCMIS 0.3.0
> Reporter: jay brown
> Assignee: Florian Müller
>
> When testing the openCMIS TCK against our server we see a great many of
> errors like this:
> FAILURE: Root folder object spec compliance (AbstractCmisTest.java:114)
> FAILURE: Property IndexationId (AbstractSessionTest.java:1215)
> FAILURE: Property is null! (AbstractSessionTest.java:1215)
> INFO: Object is null!
> the offending xml element in our response looks like this:
> <cmis:propertyId queryName="IndexationId" displayName="Indexation Id"
> localName="IndexationId" propertyDefinitionId="IndexationId"/>
> Since our metadata for this property states that this is not required
> (required=false), I believe this representation is a valid way to express a
> 'not set' condition.
> Can we change to TCK to accept this form of a 'not set' property?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
