Just out of curiosity: why did you expect DotCMIS to perform better than OpenCMIS? (Even though I expect OpenCMIS to have more optimisations than DotCMIS, I would have expected the JVM to have way more years of optimisations than the .net stackŠ)
Regards, Dieter On 15/04/14 21:25, "Tetsunori Inada" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >I've done some function performance comparisons between OpenCMIS 0.10.0 >and DotCMIS 0.6.0. >Even though I was expecting that DotCMIS would perform better than >OpenCMIS, I found that functions/methods like CheckOut() and CheckIn() >take about 50% to 100% longer to process with DotCMIS. >For instance, for updating a same document: >CheckOut(): 350ms for OpenCMIS and 770ms for DotCMIS >CheckIn(): 434ms for OpenCMIS and 619ms for DotCMIS >(Each process time may differ but roughly the ratios are consistent.) > >Is it normal to have such much slower performance with DotCMIS? >And is there any chance that DotCMIS can outperform OpenCMIS with any >future releases? > >Best regards, > >Tetsunori Inada >OBJECTIF LUNE >Product Integrator >Intégrateur de produits >T +1 514 875 5863 x643 >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | >www.objectiflune.com <http://www.objectiflune.com/>
