Both of you are correct. I can not use lazy consensus on package release. We have a problem that we don't have enough PMC to vote. PMCs, please vote or Chukwa will not see any future release, which can be a problem for the community. Thank you for your assistance.
regards, Eric On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree with Alan, please see "Votes on Package Releases" in [1] > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval > <http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval> -- i.e. > at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there > must be more positive than negative votes." > > [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > You cannot lazy consensus release votes. > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > > On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am waiting for lazy consensus condition to pass. I will do the > update > > > after the weekend, if there is no objections. > > > > > > regards, > > > Eric > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Don’t we need three binding votes? > > >> > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Alan > > >> > > >> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Result of the vote: > > >>> > > >>> 1 +1 binding > > >>> 0 -1 > > >>> > > >>> The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this > > >> information, > > >>> if there is no objections. > > >>> > > >>> regards, > > >>> Eric > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
