On 15/06/2010 06:01, Finn Bock wrote: > > In jira [1] and the development notes for 2.3 [2] there is outlined a > desire for a default implementation of the ConfigService. I'm working > on this and will welcome your comments when it is ready. Your Click > annotations is an obvious candidate for subclassing the > DefaultConfigService class instead of XmlConfigService.
I agree with this approach. The XmlConfigService methods is tightly coupled to XML so exposing those methods might lead to subclasses that have to deal with XML as well. With a clean default implementation we could expose more surface areas for wiring up the configuration in different ways. Kind regards Bob
