[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13680452#comment-13680452
]
Michael Joyce commented on CLIMATE-91:
--------------------------------------
Should we even bother keeping the old UI? If we're not going to use it I
don't see a reason to move everything around to accomodate it. Just delete
it. Although I do think we should have a discussion regarding the overall
structure of the repo. Hopefully we can get it more in line with other
Python projects.
Thoughts?
-- Joyce
> Webapps directory restructure
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: CLIMATE-91
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-91
> Project: Apache Open Climate Workbench
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: rcmet ui
> Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating
> Reporter: Shakeh Khudikyan
> Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
> Priority: Minor
>
> The rcmet directory [1] has two subdirectories, ui and webapp, that are both
> user interface components of the Open Climate Workbench. It can be a little
> confusing for new users to decipher what is the different between the two.
> They are in reality the same component however one is an older version.
> Therefore, I suggest moving both the ui and webapp directory into one common
> directory.
> Move the content in webapp into a subdirectory and name it rcmet-ui (since it
> is the UI that worked with the python code when it was still called RCMET)
> and move ui directory into webapp.
> This is how it would be organized.
> |--Webapp/
> |------------ ui/
> |------------ rcmet-ui/
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/climate/trunk/rcmet/src/main/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
