On Wed, Mar 20, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev > and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For > example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's not > specifically about developing cloudstack, but about managing our > community activities. > > Does anyone think it makes sense to break that type of discussion out > into a general@ list?
Apologies - in all the excitement last week, I totally missed this proposal/discussion. That would give us a impressive set of lists. (dev@, users@, marketing@, announce@, issues@, and commits@ - plus at least two non-English lists, IIRC) That's a lot of lists to manage and follow. We are an active bunch, but I'm concerned that about discussions being "missed" if they take place on general@ and not dev@. Not -1 concerned, but raising it so we are conscious of potential problems. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
