Thanks for the comments Chiradeep. I will update the rule name. Thanks, Jayapal
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 4:19 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-779] Egress firewall rules for SRX > > LGTM. > Only thing I'd be careful of the length of the policy name. > Note that the networkid is long, so you could end up with a policy name > egress-trust-untrust-1234567890123. Perhaps e-t-u-<network-id> > > > > On 3/28/13 8:38 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > >I would like to propose the egress firewall rules feature for the > >external firewall device SRX guest network. > > > >Currently egress firewall rules is supported in the VR isolated network. > >With this feature egress firewall rules is supported in the external > >device SRX guest networks. > > > >Jira Id: > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779 > > > >FS: > >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Egress+firewall > + > >rul > >es+feature+support+for+external+device+Juniper+SRX > >Please let me know your comments on the above FS. > > > >Thanks, > >Jayapal
