On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:42:45AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> 
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, L Radhakrishna Rao <satishsaga...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > So are we going to report it into python?
> > 
> > What's the entire plan?
> > 
> 
> Rao, there is no real plan but instead things that we should do as a 
> community.
> 
> Deltacloud is an apache project http://deltacloud.apache.org that offers 
> among other things a standard interface (CIMI) to several cloud backends.
> Adding a CloudStack driver in delatcloud would give CloudStack a CIMI 
> interface.
> Deltacloud is written in ruby, the path to the CS driver could be to use 
> Chip's start with a ruby client 
> https://github.com/chipchilders/cloudstack_ruby_client
> 
> There is another Cloud standard out there, OCCI and it also has a ruby 
> implementation. So the CS ruby client could be leveraged to also implement an 
> OCCI interface: https://github.com/gwdg/rOCCI
> 
> That said, if you are more interested in Python, there is also an OCCI 
> project: http://occi-wg.org/2012/02/20/occi-pyocni/
> 
> If you want to work on the CloudStack core code, Cloudmonkey and Marvin are 
> written in Python, you could look at those projects (under /tools in the 
> cloudstack source tree), browse JIRA for open tickets in those components and 
> start hacking :)
> 
> -sebastien

And the conversation about Python started in this thread due to Prasanna
suggesting that we have someone work with the Apache Libcloud project to
provide a CloudStack driver over there.  That's a Python-based project.

> 
> 
> 
> > Can you please elaborate if you are comfortable with it.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Musayev, Ilya <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> This is ruby based.
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: L Radhakrishna Rao [mailto:satishsaga...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:26 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Discuss][DeltaCloud]CloudStack suppprt
> >> 
> >> Hi Musayev,
> >> 
> >> In the meantime, kindly let me know what skills do I need to study?
> >> 
> >> I am familiar with Python, but have not developed anything big yet, as did
> >> not get chance.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Musayev, Ilya <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> RK and Chip
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks for the feedback, let me take it back to my team.
> >>> 
> >>> We will respond as soon as we have something solidified.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks
> >>> ilya
> >>> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: L Radhakrishna Rao [mailto:satishsaga...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:11 AM
> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [Discuss][DeltaCloud]CloudStack suppprt
> >>> 
> >>> Definitely, I would like to contribute.
> >>> 
> >>> The only pain for me is the starting point.
> >>> 
> >>> If I can get any sort of guidance, I will take it forward :).
> >>> 
> >>> And oh yes, I am not going to say that this is my first time etc, as I
> >>> want to jump in this.
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> RK
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Chip Childers
> >>> <chip.child...@sungard.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:39:46PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> >>>>> For python there's libcloud - I was going to work on support in
> >>>>> Apache Libcloud but never found bandwidth. If anyone's interested
> >>>>> they have a pretty active community. Would be nice to
> >>>>> cross-contribute to their effort.
> >>>> 
> >>>> +1, and a similar issue with a path to completing the Deltacloud
> >> plugin.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On 3 April 2013 20:29, Musayev, Ilya <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Team WebMD would like to write drivers for CloudStack and
> >> DeltaCloud.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Reaching out to dev community to see if anyone has started this
> >>>> project already or wants to join and we can work together or we will
> >>>> be the first ones to write a support for it.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Feedback is welcome,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Ilya
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to