Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a time-based bug fix release from going out just because it doesn't fix every bug we know of, only if it introduces a bug. On Apr 17, 2013 8:09 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" <j...@zonker.net> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 08:50 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > Ok solved in 95f87bd96e0db0d061e37245166059d5eb7a073b > > > > But unfortunately I want to raise > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 which is a blocker > > for 4.0.2 and yet still open. > > > > Nicolas emailed several times about it already . > > I'm aware of the issue, but as of yet no one has stepped up to fix it > and we've got a slew of other issues that are in the release. > > Will stop the vote due to the RAT issues, and if anyone would like to > step up on 528 now would be a very good time to do so. > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
