On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:27:07AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I like Joe's proposition of potentially housing the [ACSEDU] tag under > > marketing. I do agree that [GSoC] is 'Dev' related and belongs on that list. > > > > > > I agree that [GSOC] should be on dev
+1 > for [ACSEDU] the only issue I see is about the target audience. Devs and > Users will/might be interested, and I want to engage contributors not just > marketing folks. How about doing that on users@ then?
