On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:25:13AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:50:39PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 02:08:46PM +0000, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > -1 :-( > > > > > > Found a small issue in packaging.sh. It did not work with the nonoss > > > build and a version number without SNAPSHOT. See ticket > > > CLOUDSTACK-2152. > > > > > > Fixed with commit f9c6d01cfb90aa7c5bac5c5be20a7a16e30a9aec and > > > df2e0108ea312e3061cd7e00d2cf4c5eaf5431fb > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Hugo > > > > Grrmph, Should we begin voting only when the following are ensured: > > > > a. builds fine (oss and nonoss) > > b. packages fine (oss and nonoss) > > c. All jenkins jobs are stable > > Yes, in fact I'm going to take a bit longer with the next round. I want > to do oss / nonoss builds + packaging testing on RHEL and Ubuntu. >
Thanks Chip - job [1] packages OSS and [2] tests the package by configuring the server on a base rhel6.3 VM with puppet. So OSS is taken care of for RHEL. [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-4.1/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-packaging/ > I do check the jenkins jobs are clear before cutting though. > > What we don't see in jenkins are the issues found with removing SNAPSHOT > from our version number, because of the way that these jobs are > currently coded (also due to the preference stated to re-version back to > the SNAPSHOT version in the repo as part of spinning out the RC... > i.e.: one commit that we use to vote against that removes SNAPSHOT and > one immediately after that reverts that change). > > -chip -- Prasanna., ------------------------ Powered by BigRock.com
