On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:25:12PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Not quite : I emailed Ashutosh about the controversial subject earlier > today. We marked off 'ipclearance' as a point-in-time. This was when > (January?) the tests were contributed to ASF and went into some legal > issues. It is the point-in-time that is referred to in the request not > the code itself. This code is post-ipclearance changes made to the > framework and sent as a patch.
Thanks for clarifying! No objection then.
