No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for now. --Sheng
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? > > On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is missing. > > > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html > > > >The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no schedule of > >recovering yet. > > > >That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template is dangerous. > > > >--Sheng > > > > > >On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek < > >> agneya2...@hotmail.com > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare system > >>VM > >> > template. Is the path used to create the templates different for > >> different > >> > Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the services > >> > installed on all the system VM templates meant for different > >>hypervisors > >> > should be same ? > >> > > >> > >> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh, if it's > >>there > >> those pkgs will be installed. > >> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee on my system and > >> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the vmware-tools. > >> > >> Cheers. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > -abhi > >> > > >> > >
