Jessica, How is this patch coming along?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Jessica Wang <jessica.w...@citrix.com> wrote: > I'll remove this option (Advance zone with SG) from UI in 4.1 branch. > Will submit a patch soon. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:46 PM > To: Alena Prokharchyk; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers > Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 > failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with > security groups) > > Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1. > > Anthony > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alena Prokharchyk > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Anthony Xu > Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 > failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with > security groups) > > Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've > checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then: > > * no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided > * 4.1 UI shouldn't let you create Advance zone with SG enabled. If UI for SG > enabled Advance zone was somehow merged to 4.1 branch, it should be reverted > as there is no backend/db upgrade support exist there. > > > -Alena. > > > > On 5/13/13 1:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >>Done. :) >> >>Regards, >> >>Paul Angus >>S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 >>paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] >>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38 >>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to >>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced >>network with security groups) >> >>Thanks, Paul. >> >>Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands >>Nicolas listed in Description? >> >> >>2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> >> >>> >>> [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlass >>> i >>> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentI >>> d >>> =13656100#comment-13656100] >>> >>> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463: >>> ---------------------------------------- >>> >>> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an >>> advanced zone with security groups. >>> >>> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message: >>> >>> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical >>> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id' >>> >>> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the >>> option to add/configure a public network. >>> >>> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found >>> (configuration : advanced network with security groups) >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> > >>> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463 >>> > URL: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463 >>> > Project: CloudStack >>> > Issue Type: Bug >>> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is >>> > the >>> default.) >>> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0 >>> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault >>> > Assignee: Wei Zhou >>> > Priority: Blocker >>> > Fix For: 4.1.0 >>> > >>> > >>> > According Wei Zhou last patch ( >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a >>> new secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to : >>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG >>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >>> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM >>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO >>> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] >>> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in >>> datacenter id=1, starting one >>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO >>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new >>> secondary storage vm >>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG >>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request >>> from data center : 1 >>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner] >>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type >>> Guest when expect to find 1 >>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks >>> > of >>> type Guest when expect to find 1 >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor >>> a >>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco >>> n >>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity >>> ( >>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se >>> c >>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem >>> i >>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem >>> i >>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10 >>> 4 >>> ) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java: >>> 3 >>> 3) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java: >>> 81) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44 >>> 1 >>> ) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java: >>> 317) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. >>> a >>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. >>> r >>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. >>> r >>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec >>> u >>> tor.java:886) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor. >>> java:908) >>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >>> > We try this patch : >>> > diff --git >>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl. >>> j >>> ava >>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl. >>> j >>> ava >>> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755 >>> > --- >>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl. >>> j >>> ava >>> > +++ >>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl. >>> j >>> ava >>> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl >>> > extends >>> ManagerBase implements Secondar >>> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId()); >>> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public; >>> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic || >>> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) { >>> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) { >>> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest; >>> > } >>> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl >>> > extends >>> ManagerBase implements Secondar >>> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics(); >>> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) { >>> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public && >>> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced) >>> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest && >>> > (dc.getNetworkType() >>> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) { >>> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest && >>> > + || (dc.getNetworkType() >>> == NetworkType.Basic))) { >>> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address()); >>> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask()); >>> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress()); >>> > Then the error : >>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO >>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new >>> secondary storage vm >>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG >>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request >>> from data center : 1 >>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner] >>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type >>> Public when expect to find 1 >>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks >>> > of >>> type Public when expect to find 1 >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor >>> a >>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco >>> n >>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity >>> ( >>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se >>> c >>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem >>> i >>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem >>> i >>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10 >>> 4 >>> ) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java: >>> 3 >>> 3) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java: >>> 81) >>> > at >>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44 >>> 1 >>> ) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java: >>> 317) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. >>> a >>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. >>> r >>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. >>> r >>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec >>> u >>> tor.java:886) >>> > at >>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor. >>> java:908) >>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >>> > Into database : >>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = >>> > 1 and >>> state <> 'DESTROY'; >>> > +--------------+ >>> > | traffic_type | >>> > +--------------+ >>> > | Management | >>> > | Control | >>> > | Storage | >>> > | Guest | >>> > +--------------+ >>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where >>> > data_center_id >>> = 1 group by traffic_type; >>> > +----+--------------+ >>> > | nb | traffic_type | >>> > +----+--------------+ >>> > | 1 | Control | >>> > | 25 | Guest | >>> > | 1 | Management | >>> > | 1 | Storage | >>> > +----+--------------+ >>> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration : >>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = >>> > 1 and >>> state <> 'DESTROY'; >>> > +--------------+ >>> > | traffic_type | >>> > +--------------+ >>> > | Management | >>> > | Control | >>> > | Storage | >>> > | Guest | >>> > +--------------+ >>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where >>> > data_center_id = >>> 1 group by traffic_type; >>> > +-----+--------------+ >>> > | nb | traffic_type | >>> > +-----+--------------+ >>> > | 1 | Control | >>> > | 362 | Guest | >>> > | 1 | Management | >>> > | 1 | Storage | >>> > +-----+--------------+ >>> >>> -- >>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA >>> administrators For more information on JIRA, see: >>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >>> >>This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are >>intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. >>Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do >>not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. >>If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither >>take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. >>Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in >>error. >>Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue >>Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. >>ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >> >> > > >
