Git blame shows un-intended change due
to c11dbad9c9ba7a876243ec02e90215906cfd9115. Nitin, can you see why your
merge brought these changes? Please figure root cause, its possible other
files got affected as well.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Rajesh Battala
<rajesh.batt...@citrix.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was not able to create LB rule on Netscaler device when Netscaler device
> is my LB provider in my network offering.
> I debugged and figured out that, in applyLBRules method
>
>
> if (canHandleLbRules(rules)) {
> return false;
> }
>
> Even the method canHandleLbRules is returning true[ means Netscaler
> element can handle the LB rule]
> its sending the wrong return value causing the failure of creating rule on
> NS device But showing the LB rule creation is success and LB rule is
> persisted in db.
>
> Fix is to add "!" in the if logic, but is there any other reason why it's
> not added. This method is introduced in recent merges.
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
