If you used VirtualMachine.create from base.py then the PF rule would be implicitly created for you. Is that the case?
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:44:13PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > +Ashutosh. > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Likitha Shetty > <likitha.she...@citrix.com>wrote: > > > Girish,**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I am not able to reproduce this on master. Can you double check if port > > forwarding has not been set on the VM?**** > > > > And if a PF rule has been configured then it is the expected behavior.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Thanks,**** > > > > Likitha **** > > > > ** ** > > > > *From:* Girish Shilamkar [mailto:gir...@clogeny.com] > > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:40 PM > > *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > *Cc:* Likitha Shetty; Parth Jagirdar > > *Subject:* assignVirtualMachine API fails**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Hello,**** > > > > ** ** > > > > While writing automation tests Changing account membership for VMs, > > assignVirtualMachine API fails with **** > > > > ** ** > > > > errorCode: 530, errorText:Failed to move vm Remove the Port forwarding > > rules for this VM before assigning to another user.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > This happens even though vm wasn't set any PF rule. We saw this > > on CloudStack-non-OSS-MASTER-373-rhel6.3**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Has anyone seen this problem before ?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > PFA, management server log.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > Regards,**** > > > > Girish**** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > -- Prasanna., ------------------------ Powered by BigRock.com
