I'm also reneging on my 0 vote, and move it to a +1 to release.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Mathias Mullins < mathias.mull...@citrix.com> wrote: > Reading through this and seeing Chiradeep's passionate comments here and > reasoning. I'Ll go from -1 to +1 on this. Especially since we will see > this in 4.2. > > I still think it's a bruise, but hopefully will not be a black eye. > > Matt > > > On 5/22/13 10:24 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > > >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > ><chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> For those wanting to use the S3-sync for XCP/Xen, they could use the 4.2 > >> template. Just like the IPV6 feature, that could be deemed experimental. > > > >I'm now in agreement with this. The "root issue" is now solved for > >KVM and VMware users in 4.1. We have also resolved the root cause in > >the new system VM templates. We can provide instructions for using > >the new system VM templates within the documentation prior to > >releasing 4.1, and highlight that required step if using S3. > > > >I'm +1 on moving forward (although I started the vote, I figured I > >should also cast a vote on this one). > >
