-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#review21082
-----------------------------------------------------------



api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/DnsmasqTO.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#comment43608>

    nit: variable name shouldn't start with caps. Change in other places as well



core/src/com/cloud/network/DnsMasqConfigurator.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#comment43618>

    Can you format these text properly? What all is comment and what all 
actually gets replaced?



core/src/com/cloud/network/DnsMasqConfigurator.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#comment43617>

    What is the correct formatting here, tag:net1,6,... (used in the code below)
    OR
    dhcp-option=6,dns1,dns2,...
    



server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#comment43619>

    You have the cidr which can be used as well in dhcp-range parameter.


- Koushik Das


On May 27, 2013, 3:05 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 27, 2013, 3:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Guest vm's nameserver is not set to VRs guest IP address 
> in case of multiple subnets
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2620
> 
> 
> This addresses bug Cloudstack-2620.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/DnsmasqTO.java f99878c 
>   core/src/com/cloud/network/DnsMasqConfigurator.java ee8e5fc 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java 
> b969be2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> tested on master.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bharat kumar
> 
>

Reply via email to