On May 29, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
<chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Certainly the behavior is not robust.

Understated but accurate. ;)

>
> On 5/29/13 10:35 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:
>
>> Before I file this as a bug, I would like to understand if this is a bug
>> or by-design.
>>
>> Summary:
>> Many times, the initial zone deployment may fail because incorrect values
>> were used during configuration process. The CS management server will go
>> in cycles over and over again, attempting to use improper values, fail
>> and retry. If left uninterrupted, this repeat cycle can go on forever.
>>
>> Specific issue was witnessed with "ClusteredAgentManager setting public
>> traffic over vSwitch: null", while technically it should have defaulted
>> to vSwitch0.
>> If left uninterrupted, it will create the SSVM VM, fail to find vswitch
>> null for public traffic,  delete storage VM, and repeat this procedure
>> unlimited times.
>>
>> On my attempt to disable Zone first, then pod, the cluster, has not
>> prevented job execution engine from running. I had to put the primary
>> storage into maintenance mode. While this approach technically stopped
>> executions on vSphere vCenter, the SSVM id increased from count of 2, to
>> count of 33 (once I resolved this issue by defining vSwtich0) -
>> indicating that job execution still continued.
>>
>> By design, when you disable cluster, should job execution stop or pause?
>> What about Pod and Zone?
>
>

Reply via email to