Comments below in red. Thanks
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:35 AM, John Burwell <jburw...@basho.com> wrote: > All, > > Since the threads discussing these patches have been very long, I want to > roll up the issue list, and ensure that we are on track to have them > resolved before the 4.2. The following is my current issue list and the > associated status: > > > - Mutual Exclusion of hypervisor throttled I/O and storage provisioned > IOPS on a per volume basis: Mike is working to implement a user interface > that prevents a user from configured both on a single volume, as well as, > service level checks to verify that both types of QoS are not defined for a > single volume. > > I should have this completed today (mainly done already, but I have some (un-related) meetings to attend before I can get back to this and finish it). > > - Verify available device capacity for provisioned IOPS: Mike has > reported completion of the code, and will push the changes to Review Board > shortly. > > Yep...this is part of the diff file I pushed to Review Board yesterday. > > - Verify available hypervisor capacity for throttled I/O: Unknown -- I > have not seen any feedback on this issue from Wei. > - Enhancement of usage data to reflect use of provisioned IOPS and > throttled I/O: We have had some conversations on how usage records should > reflect when these QoS are being used, but we have not arrived at > answer/solution. Both patches likely require modification to address this > issue. > > This is something I have little knowledge of (usage statistics). Please let me know if you feel I need to make some changes for this. Thanks! > > Finally, we need to ensure that the code-level issues identified in Review > Board have also been addressed, and then we can run through a final review > pre merge. > > Thanks, > -John > > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *™*
