I'm +1 also to taking the latest stable release. Tom.
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 13:28 -0400, John Burwell wrote: > Edison, > > I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with > security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any > "refinements" that Amazon introduces as part of their continuous > improvement/deployment model. > > Thanks, > -John > > On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to > > adapt to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to > > upgrade to latest SDK? > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: AWS SDK version for object store > >> > >> There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears I > >> can't > >> use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception when this is > >> done > >> [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also couple of other > >> issues fixed > >> related to s3 on the latest version of the SDK. Is there any reason not > >> to use > >> the latest stable SDK version in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the > >> v1.3.21? > >> > >> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374 > >> > >> -- > >> Prasanna., > >> > >> ------------------------ > >> Powered by BigRock.com > > > -- Cloudian KK - http://www.cloudian.com/get-started.html Fancy 100TB of full featured S3 Storage? Checkout the Cloudian® Community Edition!
