See CLOUDSTACK-3480. if using object store the templates are going to
be wrong since the storage code will get the templates as in the
template table. There is no "seeding" the template when using the
object store feature. Is this related to what you are seeing?

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:17:25PM +0000, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> FYI:  the default XenServer System VM does not use the latest JSON 
> serialisation design.  Must be some old code in there.
> 
> See 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3377?focusedCommentId=13713542&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13713542
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: 12 July 2013 8:51 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Does the default Xen SystemVM Template understand S3?
> > 
> > AFAIK, yes.  That code is loaded when the agent software is updated by the
> > mgmt server.
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 05:02:12PM +0000, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> > > AFAIK, the database deploy script in Master sets the Xen SystemVM URL
> > > to
> > > http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-
> > 02062012.vhd.
> > > bz2
> > >
> > > Is this SystemVM image aware of S3 object store?
> > >
> > > If now, can someone recommend a Xen image that both works and works
> > with S3?
> > >
> > >
> > > DL
> > >
> > >

-- 
Prasanna.,

------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com

Reply via email to