Hi Daan,
multipath is not used in our environments at all.
The tests for PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524 look ok
until now. Let's wait for the test results.
-Wei
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wei, is this with a VM/Volume not using multipath itself? If it is it
> is definitely a reason to create a new RC, if it isn't I think we can
> manage a known issue for a new feature.
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:50 PM Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.
> >
> > I ran some tests on a ubuntu22 environment , and got the following
> > exception when stopping VMs.
> >
> > 2024-01-17 12:56:26,053 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > (AgentManager-Handler-17:null) (logid:) Seq 2-8295911988593164342:
> > Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 32989056598488, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> >
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":"false","details":"java.lang.NullPointerException
> > at com.cloud.utils.script.Script.getExitValue(Script.java:74)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.runScript(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:476)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:226)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.KVMStoragePoolManager.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(KVMStoragePoolManager.java:205)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.cleanupDisk(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3335)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:101)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:49)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtRequestWrapper.execute(LibvirtRequestWrapper.java:78)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1903)
> >
> > The workaround is
> > chmod +x /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/multipath/*.sh
> > The PR to fix it : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524
> >
> >
> > Please note, this is not a -1 on the RC2. If we think this is not a
> > critical issue, we need to update the upgrade instruction for it.
> >
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Abhishek Kumar <shwst...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
> for
> > > a vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240115T1418
> > > Commit: 38bd4fd72bdae354c4b0f615a4861fc84d67b29a
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using
> 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to:
> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC2/
> > >
> > > Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory
> > > before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed:
> > > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > > "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Abhishek
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
