happy to discuss further (not agreeing at all with the arguments). This vote is closed without conclusion.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 5:28 PM Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > Agree with Daniel, I would prefer to discuss this further too. I think we're > moving too fast with the voting. > > > Regards. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Guto Veronezi <gutoveron...@apache.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 20:25 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] drop first version number and continue with semantic > versioning > > Hello guys, > > I just replied the discussion thread and I would like to discuss it a > little bit further before voting. > > Best regards, > Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi) > > On 1/25/24 11:47, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > LS, > > > > As previously discussed [1] there is a growing wish to no longer carry > > the version number 4 in future versions. The proposal is to proceed as > > usual but just drop the first number. This means the next version will > > be called 20.0, in addition to a possible 4.18.2 and/or 4.19.1 > > > > +1 for agree > > 0 for no strong opinion or objects either way > > -1 for disagree (add your reason to be counted) > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/lh45w55c3jmhm7w2w0xgdvlw78pd4p87 > > -- Daan
