Hi Mauro,
There is a bug in listing the tagged network offerings [1].
Still, you should be able to create the network on the new physical networks
with API/CMK.
create network physicalnetworkid=5e453b97-9f7f-4319-9923-d2e96aff21cf
name=guestOnNewPhysicalNet6 displaytext=guestOnNewPhysicalNet6
networkofferingid=d1ee95fd-b4f3-4d50-9822-5b96fc579311
zoneid=1dae2f71-4763-423e-9072-40ee72bde535 gateway=10.10.10.1
netmask=255.255.255.0
In case the virtual router provider fails to get configured and enabled on the
new physical network you may try updating the DB ( take necessary precautions
and do tests)
Example:
update physical_network_service_providers set state='Enabled' where id=43;
mysql> select * from physical_network_service_providers where
physical_network_id=206 and provider_name='virtualrouter'\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 43
uuid: b380ebce-605c-41f7-992f-ec35db82780e
physical_network_id: 206
provider_name: VirtualRouter
state: Enabled
destination_physical_network_id: 0
vpn_service_provided: 1
dhcp_service_provided: 1
dns_service_provided: 1
gateway_service_provided: 1
firewall_service_provided: 1
source_nat_service_provided: 1
load_balance_service_provided: 1
static_nat_service_provided: 1
port_forwarding_service_provided: 1
user_data_service_provided: 1
security_group_service_provided: 0
networkacl_service_provided: 0
removed: NULL
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10316
-Jithin
From: Mauro Ferraro - G2K Hosting <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 4 February 2025 at 3:35 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, Wei ZHOU
<[email protected]>
Cc: Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>, dev <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0
Hi Wei, thanks for you answer.
About this issue, we do some tests and we think it is a bug. I will give
you more details about the tests:
We have CloudStack 4.19.1 KVM cluster
CS has two physical network interfaces configured in CloudStack as follows:
* *Physical Network 1 (cloudbr0)*: Handles all general CloudStack
traffic (VMs, Guest, Management, Public). This network has no tag.
* *Physical Network 2 (cloudbr1)*: Handles primary storage traffic in
CloudStack (NFS for qcow2 images). This network is tagged as “STO.”
All hosts have both network interfaces. What I want to do is create a
shared network to connect *Physical Network 2* to a virtual router so
that VMs associated with this virtual router can reach the network
behind *Physical Network 2*.
As shown in the video, when we try to add the shared network, the
offering corresponding to *Physical Network 2*, associated with the
"STO" tag, does not appear.
Video:
youtu.be
2025 02 03 17 44 08 <#>
🔗 https://youtu.be/o-NTlrbdCQE <https://youtu.be/o-NTlrbdCQE>
El 3/2/2025 a las 11:17, Wei ZHOU escribió:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> After some discussions, we tend to consider that it is not a bug.
>
> If you have multiple physical networks with Guest traffic, it is
> recommended to keep the default physical network untagged.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Wei
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:46 PM Mauro Ferraro - G2K Hosting <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, how are you?.
>>
>> We download de RC to test the
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9673 but we noted that is
>> not available yet. So, we want to wait this issue to test this specific
>> and complex situation.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> El 3/2/2025 a las 06:26, Daan Hoogland escribió:
>>> LS,
>>>
>>> I've had no reactions. I can say "no news is good news" or be a
>> pessimist.
>>> Did anybody at all have a look yet? The 72 hours are way gone, and we
>> had a
>>> weekend as well.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daan Hoogland<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> LS,
>>>> I uploaded convenience packages to
>>>> https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2.0-RC20250128T0916/ for
>>>> those interested.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:28 AM Daan Hoogland<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created a 4.19.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:
>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250128T0916Commit:
>> 5c6b04f6bfcca575492e97f32a6d1d23b49bdffc
>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>>> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.2.0/
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using
>> 256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am in the process of creating convenience packages and will update on
>>>>> those in this mail-thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
