+1 binding checked signatures and did a minimal test on logging in (retrieve provider from registry and see if it tries something) Other than that I am relying on the rest of the community ;)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 1:29 PM Kiran Chavala <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi ALL > > I've created a CloudStack Terraform Provider release candidate for version > 0.6.0, with the following artefacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack > > Commit: e53f30cccd94e06a771f131a27e1f50de4ed8753 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudstack-terraform-provider-0.6.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using E03379CB066175FAC2BC9E027B3F1C5E93F97FAB): > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For testing/voting purposes, you can use the provider > > terraform { > required_providers { > cloudstack = { > source = "cloudstack/cloudstack" > version = "0.6.0-rc3" > } > } > } > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > -- Daan
