bhouse-nexthop opened a new issue, #278:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/278
When creating a port forward I see:
```
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# cloudstack_port_forward.bastion will be created
+ resource "cloudstack_port_forward" "bastion" {
+ id = (known after apply)
+ ip_address_id = "02aae2fe-ae43-4030-8123-8967931fd7e1"
+ managed = false
+ forward {
+ private_end_port = (known after apply)
+ private_port = 22
+ protocol = "tcp"
+ public_end_port = (known after apply)
+ public_port = 5022
+ uuid = (known after apply)
+ virtual_machine_id = "bebcac94-65f5-4c73-8586-e6e860bcc17e"
# (1 unchanged attribute hidden)
}
}
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
Do you want to perform these actions?
Terraform will perform the actions described above.
Only 'yes' will be accepted to approve.
Enter a value: yes
cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Creating...
cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Still creating... [00m10s elapsed]
╷
│ Error: Provider produced inconsistent result after apply
│
│ When applying changes to cloudstack_port_forward.bastion, provider
"provider[\"registry.terraform.io/cloudstack/cloudstack\"]" produced an
unexpected new value: Root object was present, but now
│ absent.
│
│ This is a bug in the provider, which should be reported in the provider's
own issue tracker.
╵
```
Though the operation actually succeeds. On subsequent runs I get:
```
Terraform will perform the following actions:
# cloudstack_port_forward.bastion will be created
+ resource "cloudstack_port_forward" "bastion" {
+ id = (known after apply)
+ ip_address_id = "02aae2fe-ae43-4030-8123-8967931fd7e1"
+ managed = false
+ forward {
+ private_end_port = (known after apply)
+ private_port = 22
+ protocol = "tcp"
+ public_end_port = (known after apply)
+ public_port = 5022
+ uuid = (known after apply)
+ virtual_machine_id = "bebcac94-65f5-4c73-8586-e6e860bcc17e"
# (1 unchanged attribute hidden)
}
}
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
Do you want to perform these actions?
Terraform will perform the actions described above.
Only 'yes' will be accepted to approve.
Enter a value: yes
cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Creating...
╷
│ Error: 1 error occurred:
│ * CloudStack API error 537 (CSExceptionErrorCode: 4360): The range
specified, 5022-5022, conflicts with rule FirewallRule
{"id":251,"networkId":219,"purpose":"PortForwarding","state":"Active","uuid":"ae971788-f28c-4e33-b3c1-dcae449bf91f"}
which has 5022-5022
│
│
│
│ with cloudstack_port_forward.bastion,
│ on network_su.tf line 79, in resource "cloudstack_port_forward"
"bastion":
│ 79: resource "cloudstack_port_forward" "bastion" {
│
```
which makes sense as the prior attempt really succeeded.
I'm running Cloudstack 4.22.0.0 with the 0.6.0 cloudstack terraform provider
with terraform v1.13.3. This also happened on the 0.5.0 cloudstack provider.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
