vishesh92 commented on PR #109:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/109#issuecomment-6161652903

   > Hi @vishesh92 , @DaanHoogland , I reviewed the changes for per-Service 
Network ACL ownership. The ownership and cleanup approach looks worth testing 
carefully, particularly when multiple Services share a port. One additional 
improvement is to use `%w` when wrapping underlying errors so callers can 
inspect the original errors. I also noticed the E2E helper `requireNoACLRules` 
checks only exact start/end port matches, so it may miss a leftover rule whose 
port range includes the requested port. The existing Copilot comment flags this 
as well.
   
   Thanks for the review. we need to ensure that deleting a service doesn't 
delete a rule which is used by another service. So, each service will have it's 
own rule. We don't really care about the range conflicts for these changes.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to