----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#review24340 -----------------------------------------------------------
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/config/ListCapabilitiesCmd.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#comment48195> no need for account id, user context should have that. We dont follow this convention. - Nitin Mehta On July 31, 2013, 10:40 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 31, 2013, 10:40 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. > > > Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2717 > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API > > This is to fix allow.public.user.templates configuration parameter to get the > value at account level. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/config/ListCapabilitiesCmd.java > a30e26c > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/CapabilitiesResponse.java > c2996f0 > server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java 26efa10 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested locally by firing listcapabilities API call for Admin/user > > > Thanks, > > Harikrishna Patnala > >
