It looks like the scripts/java binaries have not been copied into the SSVM? See this thread http://markmail.org/thread/niu2qwsdydkuh2fe for how it is supposed to work (response from Alex)
On 8/19/13 12:32 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" <chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote: >I am having an issue getting my SSVM up and running. After pulling, >rebuilding and seeding with the newest system vm template, I was unable >to register an ISO, so when I logged in to the SSVM to run ssvm-check.sh, >I found that the script was not present on my ssvm. > >So my first question is, was this script removed, or is something wrong >with the ssvm? > >If I copy the script over manually and run, this is what I get: > >root@s-1-VM:~# ./ssvm-check.sh >================================================ >First DNS server is 8.8.8.8 >PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes >64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=40 time=26.465 ms >64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=40 time=26.172 ms >--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- >2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 26.172/26.319/26.465/0.147 ms >Good: Can ping DNS server >================================================ >Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com >================================================ >NFS is currently mounted >================================================ >Management server is 10.63.172.148. Checking connectivity. >Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 >================================================ >ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. > >And yes, I tried restarting the ssvm =) > >FWIW, if I run a df, this is the output: > >root@s-1-VM:~# df >Filesystem 1K-blocks Used >Available Use% Mounted on >rootfs 282599 120171 > 147836 45% / >udev 10240 0 > 10240 0% /dev >tmpfs 25204 140 > 25064 1% /run >/dev/disk/by-uuid/5129b148-8ca5-48fb-9f62-38861be97287 282599 120171 > 147836 45% / >tmpfs 5120 0 > 5120 0% /run/lock >tmpfs 80300 0 > 80300 0% /run/shm >/dev/xvda1 29745 17519 > 10690 63% /boot >/dev/xvda6 53544 4978 > 45802 10% /home >/dev/xvda8 376807 10388 > 346963 3% /opt >/dev/xvda10 48585 4891 > 41186 11% /tmp >/dev/xvda7 623872 623872 > 0 100% /usr >/dev/xvda9 424420 108890 > 293617 28% /var > >Should /usr be at 100% usage? > >I don't see anything in the management server logs or ssvm that would be >of any help. > >Thanks, >Chris