Hi Sheng, Done, thanks.
I used to use git-format-patch, but recently I've been using RBTools / post-review. What is the difference between the patches generated by post-review and git-format-patch? If post-review produces diffs we don't like, we can probably remove the recommendation to use it from here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git Thanks, Dave. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I've committed your patch to 4.2-forwarding. > > But it cannot apply on MASTER, so please rebase it. > > And it would be better if you use git-format-patch to generate patch. > > Thanks! > > --Sheng > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Dave Cahill <dcah...@midokura.com> wrote: > > > Hi Sheng, > > > > Thanks for reviewing. > > > > The name change is also necessary for 4.2. Since the code changes are > > entirely restricted to plugin code (all within the midonet dir), I think > > it's a very safe change. > > > > Thanks, > > Dave. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > I've taken a look at the patch. The dhcp capability fix is pretty > simple, > > > but the name changing part involved much more modifications. Can the > name > > > change done after 4.2? It should reduce the patch size a lot. > > > > > > --Sheng > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Dave Cahill <dcah...@midokura.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's > > > > restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change > to > > > > grab. > > > > > > > > Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the > > change, > > > as > > > > it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in > core > > > > code > > > > . > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dave. > > > > 2013年8月27日火曜日 Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com: > > > > > > > > > Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and > > > > > instead pick the one from Jessica? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Animesh > > > > > > > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > <javascript:;>] > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM > > > > > To: Brian Federle > > > > > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>; > > > > Jessica > > > > > Wang > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle < > > > brian.fede...@citrix.com > > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <mailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote: > > > > > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this > > > > commit > > > > > below yours: > > > > > > > > > > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48 > > > > > Author: Jessica Wang <jessicaw...@apache.org<javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > jessicaw...@apache.org <javascript:;>>> > > > > > Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700 > > > > > > > > > > CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > > configure > > > > > physical network > edit traffic type label > split > > > > > > > > > > Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as > > you. > > > > > > > > > > I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git > > > myself > > > > > in the past when I forget to rebase :D > > > > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > > > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM > > > > > To: Mike Tutkowski > > > > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle; Jessica > > Wang > > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking > > > branch > > > > > 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward" > > > > > > > > > > Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread. > > > > > > > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > <javascript:;>] > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM > > > > > To: Animesh Chaturvedi > > > > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand how those got in there. > > > > > > > > > > I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier > checkin. > > > > > > > > > > They are not related to my fix. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > > > > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote: > > > > > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac > > > > > > > > > > I see a few changes to > > > > > > > > > > Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js > > > > > Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js > > > > > > > > > > Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Animesh > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, Animesh. > > > > > > > > > > > > My changes are in 4.2-forward now. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > > > > > > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>] > > > > > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Hi Animesh, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i). > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This > > fix > > > > > > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and > > should > > > > > > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code > has > > > > been > > > > > > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that > I > > > > would > > > > > > >> > need to modify. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Talk to you later, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302> > > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > > > > > > *(tm)* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302> > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > > > > > *(tm)* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Mike Tutkowski > > > > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc. > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud< > > > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Mike Tutkowski > > > > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc. > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto: > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud< > > > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
