Hi Swamy, Thanks for setting up a call, the other day, we were able resolve this issue quickly. In what scenario would vlan id be passed? How does passing vlan id change/affect Portable IP range to be created ? I am guessing that Portable IP range created would be within IP range assigned for the vlan. (which as of now does not work)
Regards, Girish On 05-Sep-2013, at 9:41 AM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru <venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Gaurav, > > The VLAN parameter is not mandatory. Depending on your environment you can > either pass a VLAN tag / untagged one. > We have updated our documents about the issue with adding same ip range > across portable and public VLANs. This is punted for 4.2.1. > > Thanks, > SWAMY > > On 04/09/13 8:26 PM, "Gaurav Aradhye" <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com> wrote: > >> Hi Swamy, >> >> As observed, if portable ip range is created with IPs overlapping with any >> of the existing public ip ranges, then it gives "Entity already exists" >> error while associating any portable ip from the created range. (But it >> doesn't give any error while creating portable ip range in this case) >> >> The question is if we can't use IPs from existing VLANs, why to pass vlan >> parameter while creating portable ip range? Keeping the default value >> "untagged" serves the purpose and works well. I didn't get this well. >> >> Can you please explain me the how we can use vlan ids to while creating >> portable range and still get it work correctly? >> >> Regards, >> Gaurav >
