H, The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack environment.
I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro for this reason. regards, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on > router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that > name. > The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this > could be solved. > > I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a > blocker but am inclined to do so. > > more accurate report will follow, > Daan > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy <i...@ianduffy.ie> wrote: >> +1 >> >> Ran against simulator. >> >> >> On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 >>> since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. >>> Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] >>> >>> [1] >>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ >>> [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >>> > +1 (binding) >>> > >>> > Tested with simulator. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > +1 (binding) >>> > > >>> > > Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: >>> > > create advanced zone >>> > > create VPC >>> > > register template >>> > > create VPC tier >>> > > create VM on tier w/NFS >>> > > create VM on tier w/CLM >>> > > create VM on tier w/Local storage >>> > > create static NAT to vm, ssh in >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala >>> > > <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> > >> +1 >>> > >> >>> > >> Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone >>> configuration. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks >>> > >> Rajesh Battala >>> > >> >>> > >> -----Original Message----- >>> > >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >>> > >> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM >>> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>> > >> Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a >>> vote: >>> > >> >>> > >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>> > >> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 >>> > >> Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f >>> > >> >>> > >> List of changes: >>> > >> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 >>> > >> >>> > >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>> > >> location): >>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ >>> > >> >>> > >> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): >>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>> > >> >>> > >> Testing instructions are here: >>> > >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure >>> > >> >>> > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). >>> > >> >>> > >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>> > >> >>> > >> [ ] +1 approve >>> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> > > >>> >>> -- >>> Prasanna., >>> >>> ------------------------ >>> Powered by BigRock.com >>> >>>
