-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/#review26786
-----------------------------------------------------------



ui/scripts/storage.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/#comment52129>

    The ui change here, is there way to disable it from ui, if the storage 
provider is not NetApp? Or move the ui change into your plugin?


- edison su


On Oct. 7, 2013, 8:26 p.m., Chris Suich wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 7, 2013, 8:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and edison su.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> After the last batch of work to the revertSnapshot API, SnapshotServiceImpl 
> was not tied into the workflow to be used by storage providers. I have added 
> the logic in a similar fashion to takeSnapshot(), backupSnapshot() and 
> deleteSnapshot().
> 
> I have also added a 'Revert to Snapshot' action to the volume snapshots list 
> in the UI.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/RevertSnapshotCmd.java
>  946eebd 
>   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties f92b85a 
>   client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in 58c770d 
>   
> engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/SnapshotServiceImpl.java
>  c09adca 
>   server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java 0a0fcdc 
>   server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java 0b53cfd 
>   ui/dictionary.jsp f93f9dc 
>   ui/scripts/storage.js 88fb9f2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I have tested all of this locally with a custom storage provider.
> 
> Unfortunately, I'm still in the middle of figuring out how to properly unit 
> test this type of code. If anyone has any recommendations, please let me know.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris Suich
> 
>

Reply via email to