Agreed. I’m not a fan of how this is working right now, but this late in the cycle I think trying to rework all of this is a scary idea. It would be a good thing to look for post-4.3.
-Chris -- Chris Suich [email protected] NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Nov 4, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:19:12PM +0000, SuichII, Christopher wrote: >> I would like to be able to leverage the existing apidoc tools to generate >> apidoc for my plugin’s exposed APIs. However, gen_toc.py expects all APIs to >> fall into one of the hard coded ‘known_categories’. Since my APIs don’t fall >> into one of the existing categories, gen_toc.py fails with the error: >> >> Exception: Need to add a category for <my api> to gen_toc.py:known_categories >> >> What are people’s thoughts on adding a category called ‘Other’ for APIs >> which do not fall into one of the hard coded categories? I’ve tested this >> locally by adding the following to gen_toc.py: >> >> To the end of the known_categories hash: 'Other' : ‘Other’ >> At end end of choose_category(fn): return known_categories['Other’] >> >> I think there is a lot to be done with the apidoc tools moving forward to >> allow third party plugins to use the tools, but this would be a quick fix >> that would at least make the tools usable for now. >> >> -Chris > > I've not been a fan of that particular configuration file personally. > IMO, if that works, then great. We should revisit removing that config > file requirement altogether though. > > -chip
