Prasanna, I took a look at the SimulatorImageStoreDriverImpl, but it seems like it's setting size correctly in that case. Also, in trying to step through the code, that section doesn't appear to be called when creating a template from a ROOT volume (I could be doing something wrong though when stepping through the code in debug mode). You mentioned that it may have been something you missed when updating aft erhte 4.2 storage refactor - is there some other plugin code that I can look at for one of the other hypervisors that might shed some light on the correct way to do this?
Thanks! On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:09 AM, David Grizzanti <david.grizza...@sungard.com > wrote: > Ok, thanks Prasanna. Will have a look and let you know what I find. > > > On Tuesday, November 5, 2013, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> This is a bug. Likely something I missed when adopting the simulator >> to the storage refactor in 4.2. You'd want to look at the >> SimulatorImageStoreDriverImpl.java#createTemplate() and see how the >> template gets registered with 0 size. >> >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:54:00AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> > Pinging Prasanna on this, >> > >> > >> > On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:07 PM, David Grizzanti < >> david.grizza...@sungard.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > I have been seeing an issue with the Simulator that I was hoping >> someone >> > > could provide some insight into. >> > > >> > > Some background. I'm running from the 4.2.0 tag on rhel 6.3, building >> from >> > > source/enabling the simulator. >> > > >> > > Overall, most operations seem to work fine, however, I noticed that >> when >> > > creating a template from the ROOT volume on a VM, the template can't >> then >> > > be used to create a subsequent VM. The reason for this seems to be >> that >> > > the "size" of the template is set to 0. After digging through the >> database >> > > a bit, I discovered that the size and physical_size columns in >> > > the template_store_ref table are set to 0 for these templates. If I >> > > correct those values for my entry after the fact, everything appears >> to >> > > work. >> > > >> > > I dug around in the code a bit as well, but nothing obvious was >> jumping out >> > > at me as to why this was happening. >> > > >> > > Any thoughts? >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > >> > > -- >> > > David Grizzanti >> > > Software Engineer >> > > Sungard Availability Services >> > > >> > > e: david.grizza...@sungard.com >> > > w: 215.446.1431 >> > > c: 570.575.0315 >> >> -- >> Prasanna., >> >> ------------------------ >> Powered by BigRock.com >> >> >> > > -- > David Grizzanti > Software Engineer > Sungard Availability Services > > e: david.grizza...@sungard.com > w: 215.446.1431 > c: 570.575.0315 > > -- David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315
