Daan, On Nov 28, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> H, > > Someone queried for the status of the contrail plugin and I noticed > that the package structure is different then the other network > plugins. The difference being that the contrail classes have > 'contrail' in their package name. > > 1 is this intentional Typically package names reflect code organization... and avoid name clashes. I wanted to avoid the possibility of name clashes. > 2 is this going to hurt some automated plugin resolving mechanism? To my knowledge, the plugin resolution mechanism doesn't depend on the package name. I have not found an instance where this is a problem. There are already plugins on the com.cloud namespaces and org.apache namespaces. Pedro.
